Given a hereditary representation of a number n in base b, let be the nonnegative integer which results if we syntactically replace each b by
(i.e.,
is a base change operator that `bumps the base' from b up to
). The hereditary representation of 266 in base 2 is
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
so bumping the base from 2 to 3 yields
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d67df/d67dfc5ac73243e8cab96850db981259a54e5744" alt=""
Now repeatedly bump the base and subtract 1,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
etc.
Starting this procedure at an integer n gives the Goodstein sequence .
is 0 for any n and any sufficiently large k. Even more amazingly, Paris and Kirby showed in 1982 that Goodstein's theorem is not provable in ordinary Peano arithmetic (Borwein and Bailey 2003, p. 35).
Goodstein's Theorem, Hereditary Representation, Paris-Harrington Theorem
Borwein, J. and Bailey, D. Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters, pp. 34-35, 2003.
Goodstein, R. L. "On the Restricted Ordinal Theorem." J. Symb. Logic 9, 33-41, 1944.
Henle, J. M. An Outline of Set Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
Simpson, S. G. "Unprovable Theorems and Fast-Growing Functions." Contemp. Math. 65, 359-394, 1987.